In Aldo Leopold’s The Land Ethic, I thought that the author made the use of land more understandable by using the analogy of comparing it to the food chain. Food chains, which are the heirarchies of the dependencies on food, are similar to the products of the land pyramid. Leopold describes the land as being a “fountain of energy flowing through a circuit of soils, plants, and animals”. Although land does depend on all of living species to circulate the upward and downward slope of the land pyramid, it’s also dependent on the energy that is created through this heirarchial consuming and growth. Not sure if anyone else sees this, but this comparisson makes me see land as being a living species as well. Food chains are part of plant, animal, and human communities, just as land pyramids involve the community of soils, water, and living organisms. And going off of Hull’s chapter 11 in Infinite Nature, does this mean that the land deserves the same rights as we do?
Tweeting the AnthropoceneMy Tweets
Tag Cloud3D animal life Anime anthropocene Anthropocentrism artificial light. Avatar carbon dioxide carbon emissions. climate climate change CO2 emissions colorado consequences contamination course info Creation Cycle Day After Tomorrow definition Earth Earth Island Journal Emerson farming film fires forest fires global warming great acceleration greenhouse gasses Hot water Hull human activity Humans identity Infinite Nature into the wild Life conditions montage Movie natural causes natural disasters Nature. Nuclear energy paper proposal point of view. Politics and the Environment population president barack obama Princess mononoke renewable sources. reports Research Paper screening report screening the anthropocene. Self-Realization sleep species. speech summary Technology the day after tomorrow The Land Ethic thoreau Walking water. week1 Week 2 week2 Week3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8